07/23/2019 / By Ethan Huff
As the “pedo island” scandal continues to unfold, tech giants like Google are frantically trying to purge all posts and search results that threaten to expose ties between Jeffrey Epstein and Democrats like Bill Clinton, and instead implicate President Trump as somehow being one of the perpetrators.
Paul Sperry from Investor’s Business Daily broke the news in a recent tweet, explaining that photos of Clinton with Epstein are being actively scrubbed from Google’s image search results, and replaced with images of Trump – the suggestion being that Trump is the one who flew in Epstein’s private jet at least 26 times, when it was actually Clinton who did this.
In truth, Trump was actually the one who blew the whistle on Epstein, having back in the day banned the sexual predator from his Mar-a-Lago resort “because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club,” official court documents reveal. But instead of standing up for these sexual assault victims, Google is instead trying to cover for the real perpetrators, which include Clinton and a host of other leftist Democrats.
According to Bradley Edwards, an attorney for Epstein’s alleged victims, Trump was actually the only person who willingly came forward when being probed about these allegations, Trump’s full and transparent cooperation with attorneys further reinforcing his innocence.
“The only thing that I can say about President Trump is that he is the only person who in 2009, when I served a lot of subpoenas on a lot of people, or at least gave notice to some pretty connected people that I wanted to talk to them – he is the only person who picked up the phone,” Edwards is quoted as saying.
Trump was “very helpful in the information that he gave and gave no indication whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward,” Edwards went on to say.
Unlike Clinton, who clearly paid many a visit to “pedo island” and was closely connected to Epstein, Trump not only wasn’t involved, but he also seems to have had no knowledge whatsoever as to what Epstein was up to, other than the fact that Epstein was known for committing sexual assault.
Keep in mind that Google isn’t the only Silicon Valley tech behemoth trying to cover for these two pedophiles. Wikipedia is similarly having its editors manipulate and alter its entries for Clinton and Epstein to hide the fact that these sexual predators and perverts were essentially buddies.
Wikipedia has already scrubbed the truth about Clinton flying on Epstein’s “Lolita Express” airplane, while quotes of Trump speaking fondly about Epstein way back before he knew the truth about who Epstein really was remain.
The fact that Google and Wikipedia see nothing wrong with rewriting history once again illustrates why we need alternative platforms like Brighteon.com and GoodGopher.com, as well as other independent media sources that, unlike the mainstream media, aren’t in the business of censoring truth and pushing propaganda and alternative facts in defense of Democrats and their child-molesting ways.
These same corrupt tech platforms are also trying to thwart the 2020 presidential election by manipulating search results, hand-selecting “news” sources that fit the leftist narrative, and even intimidating their conservative employees into either towing the line or being fired.
“Notice how there are NO accusations against Clinton directly?” noted one Big League Politics commenter, probing another angle of Big Tech’s censorship.
“Every one of those girls is afraid that they would be DEAD in a few hours of making such a claim. Not even the Feds are attempting to move against Billy boy … I think that they are afraid as well.”
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under: algorithms, Big Tech, bill clinton, Child abuse, child sex trafficking, Clinton, Donald Trump, epstein, fake news, Google, image search, Jeffrey Epstein, Pedophilia, propaganda, Trump, Wikipedia
COPYRIGHT © 2017 BigTech.news
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. BigTech.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. BigTech.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.