03/23/2022 / By Ethan Huff
To keep people from reading an article about false death count reporting throughout the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) plandemic, social media giant Twitter reportedly plastered a warning across all links to the website hosting it, in this case the DailyMail Online, dubbing it “unsafe.”
Twitter users who attempted to click the article to read more about how untold thousands of deaths were falsely labeled as “COVID” deaths were met with a message explaining that the link could be “malicious” or “spammy.”
“The link you are trying to access has been identified by Twitter or our partners as being potentially spammy or unsafe, in accordance with Twitter’s URL policy,” the prompt read.
The rest of the prompt read: “This link could fall into any of the below categories: malicious links that could steal personal information or harm electronic devices; spammy links that mislead people or disrupt their experience; violent or misleading content that could lead to real-world harm; and certain categories of content that, if posted directly on Twitter, are a violation of the Twitter Rules.
Twitter users were then given the option, in a large blue box, to go “Back to previous page.” Those who chose to read the article anyway were offered a smaller link at the bottom along with the text, “Ignore this warning and continue.”
As of this writing, Twitter stopped blocking links to the DailyMail Online article in question, which was written by the news outlet’s deputy health editor Eve Simmons.
The article itself revealed that the COVID death toll in Great Britain (and likely everywhere else) was vastly overestimated by government officials. Simmons called the way mortalities were recorded throughout the plandemic “chaotic,” noting that thousands of deaths in the U.K. were “wrongly” blamed on the virus.”
“The health chiefs admitted, embarrassingly, that the numbers they’d been feeding the Government were only an approximation – provoking fury from Ministers,” Simmons further wrote.
“More recently it was revealed that a quarter of Omicron deaths included in the daily figures did not, in fact, list COVID as a primary cause … More than two years since Covid-19 emerged, many feel they want a simple answer: how many were killed by this virus?”
For daring to publish this, Simmons met the ire of Jack Dorsey’s censorship army, which apparently became extremely triggered by the revelation. This is par for the course on Twitter, of course, which routinely censors the truth, especially when it harms the pharmaceutical industry.
In this case, revealing too much about how government officials lied about the COVID death count threatens to expose other key players, which we can only assume are among the Twitter “partners” that requested the DailyMail Online article be slapped with a warning label.
As someone in the comment section at Reclaim the Net, which reposted part of the DailyMail Online article, pointed out, the Fauci Flu is not a “virus,” but rather a bioweapon.
“This bio-weapon still only amounts to a cold and flu-like symptoms if one is really unhealthy,” this person added. “The real deadly bioweapons are the experimental mRNA bioweapon injections that have the added bonus of changing one’s genetic makeup, rendering the individual non-human.”
Over at Natural News, a reader suggested that Dorsey belongs in prison for his complicity in censoring important truths that could save lives. Perhaps justice will one day come to him and everyone else involved in committing crimes against humanity under the cover of “public health.”
More related news about Big Tech’s hatred for free speech and all things truth can be found at Censorship.news.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
Big Tech, Censorship, COVID, COVID deaths, DailyMail, deception, disinfo, fascism, free press, freedom, Jack Dorsey, Plandemic, propaganda, Public Health, speech police, Suppressed, tech giants, technocrats, thought police, truth, Twitter, Tyranny
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 BigTech.news
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. BigTech.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. BigTech.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.